|
Kasz216 said: A) No, the quote metnioned practiced invasions. B) I'd agree with cuting the ongoing wars and protecting half the countries we'd protect sure. Though I don't think america's ambitions stem from imperilism. As if given the chance I don't think the US Would want direct legislative control or ownership claims. |
Lol, US invasion to anything even 10x smaller in scale than China military strength is failed reality check and potential fuck up of the immense size, a-la Vietnam 2. Even in cae of Yugoslavia it never came to onland operation (outside some troops in Croatia). Though sooner or later it's bound to happen, I mean failed reality check. It always happens to imperialist warmongers, especially when they're desperate :D
|
Kasz216 said: Unlike say.... Russia, who keeps causing uprisings in adjacent countries and creating autonomous zones with pro russian governments who essentially wish to merge with Russia. |
So you've learned smth from me after all? Do not defend - attack! This's the way of true forum dweller :D
Ok, let's take it from here. Even if we ignore the fact of how many bitches allies you have in the Americas and around the world, who aren't accountable to anyone but to the guy appointed from DoS (yeah, real sovereignty is rare beast today), or why do we want to merge with anyone in the first place (as if we do not have enough territories already, lol?), what are those zones to be specific? Just name them, and I'd kindly explain you everything you want to know.
