rocketpig said:
pezus said:
NintendoPie said:
pezus said:
Bold: Still a price that needs to be payed...and no, I don't have to pay for a contract lulz.
|
Oh my gosh. The price doesn't really matter anyway, the iPhone 5 is "better" than the Vita.
|
" So, with this... I was right and the Vita is now at least equaled, but more than likely surpassed by a $200 phone in terms of raw power. "
This is the sentence I disagree with. It's not a $200 phone. That's a fact. Vita is about 2/5 of the price of an iPhone 5.
|
Six of one, half dozen of the other. Yes, you have to pay for the cellular service. If you already own a smartphone or planned to buy one anyway, that cost is immaterial. If you don't own one and don't plan to buy one, then it's significant.
|
Thank you for explaining that better than I seemed to have.
:)