Jay520 said:
For example, let's say you're thinking of the color blue. While that may be true, it's not a fact. Because with modern technology, no one can prove what you're thinking about with a reasonable degree of accuracy and precision. |
Neither of the criteria you're laying out are true.
First, one cannot use an abstraction as fact except that in the abstraction itself must necessarily be true as an abstraction; you are not thinking of blue, you are thinking of an abstraction of blue, and that is a fact and a truth.
A fact is something which is real.
A truth is a fact that is known.
Unless you want to really argue about epistemology, I guess, in which case this shit is going ot get a lot more involved in the next couple of posts depending on your view on the limits and origins of human knowledge