By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
happydolphin said:
oniyide said:

YOu WAS and you didnt, that means you didnt follow the game, like you are suggesting some of these people do ;)...but you are right it was being made regardless, so this isnt exactly the same situation, hell for all intents and purposes this isnt even a 3rd party game anymore

I explained to you that I didn't have enough money at the time, I couldn't afford it. I had the box in my hand when I realized I was running up my credit and it was a bad idea. And I played it in arcades too Oni, the year it came out. I did follow the game because I really did love it. To buy a console for just one game is a sign of that. The reason I opted out is personal.

But yeah, at this point Bayonetta is kind of like another Last Story, and Oni it makes sense because that's how Nintendo rolls and they've said so. They partner with some companies to help them complete and distribute games, but they don't moneyhat.

And how do you know thats not the case for at least SOME of the people who are upset?? Maybe they cant afford to plunk down money for a Wii U just like you couldnt afford to plunk down for 360. That doesnt make them or you less of a fan, sometimes you just cant get the money together. If that is there reasoning they have every right to not be happy, just like you werent happy that SF wasnt on Wii, hell Id go so far as to say they even have more legit reason to be uspet, the original B was released on a system they have. When was the last time a SF game was released on a NINTY home console?? But you went with Wii anyway(im sure you have your reasons, and they are probably good, HDs too expensive, you might be a bigger fan of Ninty games than SF, etc.)

I never said they moneyhatted and even though im not a fan of B or any of PG games (i find them kinda bland), this shows me that Ninty is being serious this time around, alot more than they were with Wii.