By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 on 13 September 2012
Edit Thread
forevercloud3000 said:
fordy said:
deskpro2k3 said:
fordy said:
deskpro2k3 said:

 

Fair enough even I have friends whose first Final Fantasy games were 8 or 9 but 7 left them with a great impact of satisfaction, and I'll quote Wada. "No Final Fantasy VII Remake Until Original Has Been Topped" -- Square Enix CEO. Wada admits that current FF games aren't up to VII's quality. Quality can mean a lot of things, so without a doubt 7 was the peak of the FF franchise before it went down hill.


Been topped in what way? You're ASSUMING quality, but the reason why Square focuses on FF7 so much is because of the numbers that were moved in the original. That's what Wada is talking about. He's not making a remake until Final Fantasy 7's SALES are topped. After all, how are they going to judge, quality-wise, whether a future Final Fantasy is as good as 7. There's no such meter in existance. Hence, Sales DO NOT equal quality.


You're the one assuming things my friend. I just quote what the SE boss said...


Then you tell me, how WOULD they measure if sometihng has beaten FF7? 

Think about it for a little, and use some logic. It doesn't hurt sometimes.


sales numbers and general fan poles, both of which scream FFVII is the best.

One only need to look at Hollywood and see how those are flawed metrics.

When you get to actual CRITICS and people who judge games on their merits... and not how much they like them.  (Two different things.)

FFVI is more likely to win out.

That's the difference, that's what your not getting in your bias.  You are judging things based on personal opinions... and not their merits.