superchunk said:
Bolded is 100% false and proven by just rereading the quotes I summarized above. This must be where you are getting so wrong in this whole thing. My only statements were that iPad3 and the stuff back then at MWC as well as launch details from CPU/GPU manufacturers showed that: I never said, in March, that Vita was being surpassed or even matched at that time by anything currently in the market or launching right then (i.e. iPAd3)... hell even the summation right in the OP of that thread clearly shows that I never said iPad3 or anything else already known beat/matched Vita... just that FUTURE (from March) phones/tablets would within the dates I just mentioned above. Hell, the last two quotes show that we both were waiting to see how it all ends in the end of the year. Clearly we weren't talking about phones/tablets on the market right then. I mean why the hell would I even bring up the 3 to 6 months thing if I was talking about product that was available in March? I never said ALL phones released this year would match/surpass Vita. I said exactly what is detailed in 1,2,3 above... it would be matched in 3 to 6, most match or exceed by end of 2012, and soundly exceed in 2013. Dude, calm down and just reread the quotes... its all there. You also quoted me every time so its not like I could of changed it. The summations above clearly show that. Again, I think you had a different convo in your head than what is written above. As for iPhone5, I said it will match Vita as I was thinking A6 would be same quad-core chip. Its right there in those linked quotes. Simple fact is I was right on the 3 to 6 month part, you weren't. That's all I said in the OP of this thread, a thread that while called you out was for a lot more people that just you. Now we'll see if 'most' phones/tablets coming out at the end of the year (i.e. last few months) match or exceed Vita as well as everything in 2013. There should be obvious caveats with this. Android and WP OEMs do put out high-end and low-end product. Of course the low-end cheap shit is not included in this... only the high-end normal stuff. Finally, there's nothing to get over. I actually don't know why you're pushing a different discussion that what is 100% clear in the linked quotes. I think you are taking this personally. Hell, I've been wrong, its not a big deal. Granted I don't make threads about me being wrong, but I do admit it when it happens. Wanna know the big things I've been wrong about if it will make you feel better? One was my sig, two was that Wii would get 3rd party support where it would be the primary console around 2009, third was that PS3 would pass 360 in world wide sales in ... I think I said 2010 but can't remember if I meant early or late 2010 or maybe early 2011, fourth was that Kinect would flop and not sale to 10% of 360s userbase (I was good on Move though).. and so forth. It happens and its not a big issue. Granted I've been right a far more things like Vita being matched (or exceeded) within 6 mos from March. |
Do not make as if im confused, butt hurt, taking it personally or whatever. You "called me out" so now im here.
The main issue i have with this whole thing is that you have singled out one line from our discussion...and you were determined to prove me wrong and you were determined to be right even when you were not (case and point the samsung Galaxy S3 Vs. Vita thread- somehow you made as if you were right about this when i was the one who guessed the correct chip to ship with the S3).
"I never said ALL phones released this year would match/surpass Vita. I said exactly what is detailed in 1,2,3 above... it would be matched in 3 to 6, most match or exceed by end of 2012, and soundly exceed in 2013. Dude, calm down and just reread the quotes... its all there."
Yes you did you very clearly said ALL phones. But that wasnt my point...i knew exactly what you meant when you said this...i knew you were talking about the bulk of high -end smartphones/tablets and not lower, end to mid ranges. I was just using this as an example of how your opening post in this thread is cherry picking and was a douchebag move and that i can also do that. So clearly when i said "NO" phones/tablets i meant just about that...BUT SINGLED OUT THE IPHONE 5 AND GALAXY S3 AS THE PROBABLY CULPRITS TO SURPASS THE VITA. I WAS RIGHT.
Dude seriously i think you are the one who needs to read the thread. You know exactly what you "meant" with most of your posts and links etc. "Vita would be surpassed very shortly" I said you were wrong and i was right.
Hell even now theres only ONE phone to surpass it...and im pretty sure you thought most high end smartphones would by now which was not the case.
