errorpwns said:
Hynad said:
errorpwns said:
Hynad said:
selnor said:
Hynad said:
selnor said:
Its a shame the visuals arent ND strength, as in a lot more devs are doing same or better these days. Now people will focus more on the gameplay. Hopefully it works well.
Still yet to buy UC3 lol.
One ting though, It would benefit from AC3 animations team. AC3 animations are 2nd toW |
Well, they're second to ND's.
|
no. AC3 beats any animation ND ever have one. Including ops video. AC3 is unbelieveable in animation.
|
Ok? Why?
Because, for you, giving any credit where credit is due to a Sony first party developer is against everything you stand for in life?
|
Come on now. I'm going to have to agree. AC3 has some killer animation. Especially considering all of it is done in a very fast pace enviroment. You give credit where it is due, not because you have bias for a company. I personally can't say for sure which one is best, but if he feels AC3 has better animation then to him he is giving the credit to the AC3 team for having better animation than Naughtydog. It doesn't mean he hates Naughtydog.
|
You obviously don't know Richard much.
|
I guess he has his bias against Naughtydog, but what if in a technical stand point AC3 does have better animations? The Assassin creed series has some really good animations. Considering your character is constantly moving between different objects, so your limb placements are constantly changing and moving. It is a bit difficult compared to your character being on solid footing for most of the game. Or in scripted scenes.
|
Hence me asking him "Why?". AC is not without merits, but if you say something like "It's better because it's better" I'm not gonna accept it as a viable argument. As for what you tried to explain, I think you're confusing the amount of movements you can do with the actual quality of animation.
CGI-Quality said:
I never realized ACIII and other titles were relevant in here. >.>
Doesn't matter what you think looks better than The Last Of Us, it's off-topic and baiting.
|
Exactly.
