d21lewis on 10 September 2012
I'm sure Sony doesn't have an infinite amount of money but is there anything that proves that, if they spend $50Million on Game A, they only have $10Million for game B.
And anybody that argues this is, in fact, the situation--are they admitting that Game B sucks? Are they admitting that, by only releasing a few exclusives a year, Microsoft is actually going the "Quality, not quantity" route? Think about what you're posting. From where I sit, it sounds like people are saying, "Since Sony has to release so many different games across so many different genres, they have to release sacrifice quality."
That's not the impression you guys are trying to make, is it?
