In all of Lance Armstrong's Tour de France victories at least the top four riders behind him have been linked to doping. Yes, I do call out hypocrisy here.

[zuvuyeay]

okr said:

chocoloco said:

okr said:
Hypocrisy? Do you still think they'd award his titles to the runner-ups. Won't happen.

I am saying it is hypocracy to even consider taking it away when the majority all dope in the sport. In fact, I say it is firmly rooted as a part of the sport.

Still trying to detect the logic in your posts.

Congratulations though: Jan Ullrich agrees with you. He recently said that he doesn't want Armstrong's 3 Tour titles where he finished 2nd. He said Armstrong was still the best, no matter how it happened, i.e. Armstrong was the best in a race of dopers (your and Ullrich's opinion) or Armstrong doped better than the others (my opinion).

Doesnt' really matter. Either way: None of these assholes (from A to Z, Armstrong to Zülle) does deserve any title in my opinion.

And just for the record: I think they all doped in this sport before (e.g. Indurain) and after Armstrong. Oh wait, no, not the British of course. Sportsmen through and through. Just ask future Sir Bradley Wiggins. They're currently on top due to a perfect mixture of diet, training and British fairplay. Or something like that.

i say,hang on old chap,let them bask in the glory like armstrong and the other golden greats until they get proved to cheating by other cyclists,scientist and all that.fair play and all that