By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
badgenome said:
richardhutnik said:

There is a bit of a difference between Lewinski and banning abortions under every single condition, cutting funding to programs that help women and a dozen other things.  Just because Clinton may of had or has issues, doesn't change GOP policy.

Actually some would say your charge is actually "desperate":

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021300189

If invoking Clinton is a sign of desperation, then the DNC was one huge exercise in desperation.

"Hey guys... remember when I was president? Those were good times, huh? Vote for Obama! (But not really, because I want Hillary to win in 2016.)"

Really, Clinton's entrance into the campaign is why I wish we had a viable third party.

I mean... I'd like a third party candidate or one reporter to just ask him....

"Many people including Obama are blaming the GFC on the repeal of Glass Steagal... not only did this happen on your presidency, but you vocally and adamantly lobied for this legislation.  Was it the cause of the GFC, and if not, why do you think the guy who thinks it was can fix the economy when he doesn't know what caused it to collapse."

It's weird to be argueing for a return to the good old Clinton Days, when the good old Clinton days were the start of the bubble that lead to the GFC.

 

It's like your old friend telling you you should hang out with his buddy because all those times you had drinking together were way more fun then all those times you spent alone with a hangover.

"I mean, remember that one time we beerbonged vodka, that was totally better then that week you spent in the hospital with alchohol poisoning.  You should totally hang out with my friend... he can get us back there."