o_O.Q said:
and as i said because you find nothing of worth to discuss or be interested in does not mean that applies to others what i've written was derived from your comments and other comments i've seen in this thread... i'm no psychic i can only comment on what you've written, not what you're feeling or thinking |
And a second time. LEARN TO READ.
1. "saying that you don't get why people are discussing the game"
I NEVER SAID I DONT GET WHY PEOPLE DISCUSS THE GAME.
2."is not indicative of interest in the game from my perspective"
I never intended to say I have interest in the game because it had nothing to do with what I wanted to say. So OF COURSE it's not indicative of any kind of interest. It's like if I say your reply is not indicative of how my cheesecake tastes...
3."because you find nothing of worth to discuss or be interested in does not mean that applies to others"
Who are you talking to dude? I have interest in the game. So why are you saying this? Just as an info? Okay let me tell you 1 thing I found out. WATER IS WET. And btw I replied to the TOPIC of the thread. To bad its not worth being discussed in your opinion.
4."what i've written was derived from your comments...."
Well it was derived from what your EGO was seeing as an insult or whatever. And I had 1 comment before you replied not several commentS.
5." i'm no psychic i can only comment on what you've written, not what you're feeling or thinking"
How about starting to do so then? You clearly didn't comment on what I said but on what YOU wanted to read.
Please read carefully.
------------------------------------
CGI-Quality said:
The entire post could easily be considered against the game, particularly what's underlined. I don't mind either way if you have interest in the game or loathe it, but it could definitely be assumed that you may not be interested in it based on that post. |
Well If one creates a thread about a specific topic (last of us scripts) then one usually thinks replies are related to the topic correct?
And whats the point in focusing on the first and last sentence (which can mean anything according to some) when the rest is clearly talking about the topic THE SCRIPTS?
So what exactly did happen here?
- First sentence (not sure if bash of game or on topic. Hmm ill take it as bash of game because Im a pessimist maybe?)
- BLOCK OF TEXT (hmm okay this is clearly on topic okay)
- Last sentence (hmm again not sure if bash of game or on topic... Ill take it as bash of game AGAIN and ignore the text in the mid even if the SO in the last sentence shows that it has something to do with the block of text in the mid.)
Makes no sense at all. And its the readers fault if something is being misinterpreted.
And whats the point in arguing now that you all already know what was ment? It just looks like people have to find excuses... This is my last reply because all this is to off-topic imho. And I said what I wanted to say several times now.
I AM LOOKING FORWARD TO THIS GAME AND DON'T UNDERSTAND THE SCRIPT FUZZ. END OF STORY. Thank you for reading.








