| wfz said: No need to act so defensive and butthurt. :P I brought up relevant points to this thread's discussion, and my extra two cents were running off topic. I was still talking about saving lives and health care, so I think it was a biiiiit more on topic than discussing charts. =) If you're so upset and adamant that we stay on topic, how come you didn't respond to the part of my post that directly related to this thread? The fact that a cure has been found years ago and it was essentially shunned from society, even when a few recent tests show it works properly and should be looked further into. Concerning, wouldn't you agree? One theory was that it was too simplistic (monetarily speaking) and wouldn't make large medical companies much money, so since they didn't see a great monetary investment in it, they don't care about it. This leads to the thought that these medical companies care more about making money than saving lives. It's just a theory, however.
I wonder what will come of this new method. |
No offense. It is just a sensitive subject for me, and your post was crazy in my opinion. Overpopulation is indeed a big problem though.
Concerning indeed, and this is just about cancer. Maybe they know much more about cures to other diseases as well but they never invest in them because they only care about money. We never know.
