Does anyone here actually agree with the Ontological Argument?

[NintendoPie]

Jay520 said:

NintendoPie said:
What Salnax said.
It's an opinion on viewing God as a perfect being... I'm not sure how that's absurd.

Sorry, I forgot the two most important paragraphs. It's tries to prove the existence of God by using the definition of a God. Basically, it says "the definition of a God requires a God must exist; therefore, God exists".

Oh, well then that does make sense... that's just plain stupid.