| Max King of the Wild said: "No matter what the reason is that made the rich as rich as they are, there is no reason for 1% of a nation to have that much wealth while everyone else struggles." And why is that? If your saying they have no reason to have that much money and they could part with some of it then I agree with you. However, it should not be mandatory at all. That should be based on the individuals personal view on things. It's their money that they made and they should have a say in how they spend it. If they want to donate most of it to the poor that should be their decision. I understand why it would be so easy for you to say otherwise but doesn't mean thats right. I am not anywhere near the 1% but I dont agree they should be footing the bill. That aint right. Though it would be nice for me. |
Just like I said in the ENTIERTY of my first post, you yourself are doing. Taking bits and pieces of what people say, and twisting it to what suits your argument. In essence I was saying that the rich didn't deserve to make as much as they did, or the lied/cheated/stole to get it, so it's blood money, and thus, not REALLY theirs to "do with as they see fit." It really is a shame how twisted the the top 1% has the nation. They have us at each others throats while they sit back and watch us kill each other off, then come by and take our wallet after we're deceased.
It does no good to try and explain it, because the damage is already done. People have already turned on each other and it would take an act of God to see people treat people like people again, instead of just a number (high OR low).
