Kasz216 said:
TWRoO said:
Turkish said:
Kasz216 said:
Chevinator123 said:
Kasz216 said:
0 here as well. Played a couple on my PS3... really wasn't impressed.
|
What Blu rays did you watch?
|
I forget the name of it, but those "Earth" Videos, they had when the Blu-ray was pretty new. My Aunt owned them and lent them to me. That and a few random rented movies from blockbuster/redbox.
|
I still dont own any documentaries, I need to find those Earth and NatGeo ones.
|
Yeah something like that I can understand wanting better resolution for, I'd love to see some 1080 Blue Planet.
For films as long as I can tell what's going on I don't think resolution matters except for crap like Transformers/Avatar.... If I can't enjoy a film at 480 it's not going to make much difference at 1080. (Hell I watched a film last night on YouTube at 360p... I do tend to look for 480 res when streaming but in this case YouTube was my only option)
|
Yeah i agree with you.
Spending more money on resolution feels a lot like spending more money on the printing in a book.
It looks better, but is completely unrelated to why i'm reading the book.
Though I'm oldschool. To me watching a movie is about getting a good story or scenario. Not random explosions.
|
I agree on the book part, cheap paperbacks are fine. Not on the movie part though.
Movies are an audio visual experience for me. I read books for stories. 2 hour movies are usually too short to paint more then a good concept. When I watch a movie I want to let my eyes wander over the screen and pick out all the details, feel goosebumps from the sound effects, tension from sudden silence, etc. Random explosions have nothing to do with it. The best movies are those where all the elements work together perfectly, story, visuals and sound.
