Why Nintendo didnt moneyhat Monster Hunter.

[phenom08]

brendude13 said:

phenom08 said:

I do agree with the multiplatformal release, its precisely what Ninty fans have been saying about all those other 3rd party games that see no release on Wii. But if a Wii fan does ask for a multiplatformal release we are all of a sudden begging for a game. Thats why im giving you such a hard time, im trying to show Sony fans and Xbox fans how annoying that is. Asking for a multiplatformal game is common sense. So now the roles are reversed and look at all the begging for a multiplatformal release on the Vita is happening. Also yes people will be more familiar with playing it on playstation, it was only released on playstation, that wouldnt effect sales at all and the 3DS version of MH may very well do better than the PSP versions thanks to a larger userbase its coming up on. GTA use to be only familiar on playstation by the way and the 360 version still outperformed.

Nintendo didn't WANT those games, they chose the type of gamer they wanted to go after and alienated everyone else. If you aren't that type of gamer then it's time to find another system. When it comes to Monster Hunter, SONY wants the game, the Vita's fanbase wants the game and it was an ex-exclusive, they have every right to beg for a multiplatform release.

As for GTA, I'm not sure whether to trust VGC's numbers (especially GTA3 selling 0.00m on XB), but I remember the GTA series being extremely popular on the original Xbox, not as much as the PS2 versions, but still very popular given the size of the user bases of both consoles.

They didnt choose a thing lol. How about provide some proof for such a claim. They didnt alienate anyone, you chose not to buy it. Anyways no Sony gamers have no right to beg for it, if it doesnt come, it doesnt come. Being extremely popular on the XBox means nothing because it was way more popular on the PS2 and yet the Xbox 360 still stole a major chunk of the fanbase like what Ninty will do when MH4 releases on the 3DS.