By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
richardhutnik said:
HulkWasRight said:
I don't want to ruffle any feathers but the fact that this question was asked at all really bothers me. I'm fairly conservative politically and have been involved in things like rallies and volunteerism with the Tea Party. The media paints us as these radical quasi-terrorists just itching to do all this harm. I'ld wager that if you put aside your pre-concieved notions and talked to members of the Tea Party in a non-aggressive way about their politics, you would find ernest kind people who want a more fiscally responsible and moral government. Furthermore violence isn't part of the game plan period. And if you still disagree that's fine, but let's make it about the issues and not indulge in paranoid fantasies of a Right Wing insurgency.

Are you bothered by the original post, or the discussions that followed?   If it comes to the original post, you can blame the sheriff for taking the discussions that way.  I had to ask, because that is what the sheriff is implying.  What may be a legitimate concern of the collapse of the United State into a civil war was put in the context of Obama getting elected would do it.  The question was then, if only RIght Wing folks would fire back.

Actually, the Sheriff suggested the exact opposite... and implied the exact opposite case.