kowenicki said:
ultima said:
kowenicki said:
exactly...its a bogus phrase.
it is marketing ploy. thats why i ticked that box in the poll.
btw i can buy a 4k tv today.... so the PS3 wasn't future proof.
|
You're just arguing semantics. By your definition, "future proof" is a term that can never be fulfilled, and hence should never be used. The fact is, by common definition, if you bought a DVD player in 1998, you were future proof, if you bought a Blu-ray player in 2006, you were future proof, just like if you buy a third generation i7 now you're future proof.
|
Thats the whole point of the thread! lol
It is asking if it is a marketing ploy.... it is. The term should never be used.
|
Nah, man. I don't think anybody reasonable will have the expectation that if they buy a piece of technology that's marketed to be "future-proof", they'll be able to use it forever and ever without it becoming obsolete. They'll simply know that they'll be able to use it for a long time without it becoming obsolete.