ishiki said:
I guess you haven't worked or known anyone to work against a microsoft or intel competitor. If they see a technology want they try to buy out the company they want. If the small company doesn't budge they abuse the legal system by stealing the idea anywayas and the small company's can't keep up with the legal fees. (apple does this too). http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/NY-attorney-general-ends-lawsuit-against-Intel-3207727.php http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/16/AR2009121601121.html http://www.washingtonpolicy.org/publications/opinion/what-happened-microsoft-ruling Here's some articles on just some of the issues microsoft and intel has had to deal with for being a "monopoly" The thing is these big company's (samsung is a huge company btw) is just a circle jerk of suing eachother while doing business with eachother it's not just apple suing everyone. Here's one of google (android suing apple). http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2012/08/21/and-now-google-sues-apple/ And consoles are closed like the iphone... android is open like PC, that was my point. Yet consoles are fine to be closed, but an Iphone isn't?Though you can jailbreak all of them. :) |
Those articles involve antitrust laws, and the corporations were hurting the industry by doing something illegal. What bugs me about this case is that Apple is hurting the industry, but they aren't doing a single illegal thing.
And iPhone's closed, but that doesn't bother me. What made you think I was against that?








