Kasz216 said:
Well it does make sense from the pro life stance. Not shooting pregnant women though. The largest issue in the abortion debate is that neither side is even having the same arguement. It's really a two part arugement. You don't see many pro choice advocates with a clear cut definition of when they think human life begins. (I'd say when the brain develops brain waives myself.)
Is there a point where it's probably a person but it's still, it's parasitic nature an nonviability makes it to where it can be ethically aborted?
There are a LOT of intersting arguments that never get had because people are trying to argue two completely different arguements. |
Well, it's not really two arguments, it's just that one preempts the other. And pro-lifers are doing everything they can to prevent any and all discussion about science, because the science sides with the women's rights.