| Persistantthug said: As if having an uncircumcised penis is just as clean and healthy as a circumcised one? Obviously, since an uncirc. penis has exposed mucous membranes for viruses to more easily penetrate, obviously the health risks through life are substantially more. It's like....fine....you have an uncircumcised penis...but don't try and bullshit everyone by lying to yourself and everyone else....OF COURSE you're more at risk to disease.....and of course it's harder to keep clean, and of course it smells more. Fine...that's what you have. But tell the truth. Sometimes the truth is unpleasant. Sometimes the truth about your own self sucks.....but truth is truth.
Sorry for rant....but it's been bothering me. |
Because if you know what water and soap is you have no problem END OF STORY.
circumcision removes the skin that is there to keep the penis "wet" and protects it from drying out which makes it less sensitive. The skin also protects it from rubbing against your legs /pants which make it even less sensitive.
It also absorbs vaginal fluid /hormones and increases your pleasure. It also has nerves that increase the pleasure.
The anti bakteria aspect is nonsense because the skin has glands that produce anti bakterial substances like lysozyme. It also produses sebum which keeps the glans healthy and soft.
The foreskin is the penis equivalent of your eyes lid. Just imagine how unhealthy it would be if your eye would be constantly exposed to air? There is a reason why we blink. Sure our penis cant blink LOL but there is a reason why males have the foreskin.
Removing it has ZERO positive effects other than boasting the EGO of people that for no reason but tradition/religion keep doing OUTDATED unhealthy shit. Doing tradition for traditions sake us useless.
Keeping it has no negative effect as long as you know how to use water/soap.
Thanks for reading.
