no im not insane those pics are high-res you can only watch them looking that good on the pc and the video gameplay is more in development while the gamecube one was early beta version... so the conclusion is GC and Xbox ver. looking almost the same but overal Gc takes the crown
No I meant are you insane thinking that pic was GC.
i just didnt noticed but the games look very similar dont you think :D
No I dont. Not in motion. in motion its cllear to see the 360 version is far superior to Xbox version. They look similar in the respect the levels are identical and the art style didnt change at all.
nonono in previouse posts i said the x360 looks better but not that much of a difference...because its a new gen console at that time.
so i was only referring GC vs 360 not the original xbox because i wanted to proof that the GC was a beast back then
Please dont get me wrong. The GC was a beast of a console. And IMO PS2 was quite away behind. Xbox just had an advantage with a more capable and feature rich GPU than what GC posted.
Something that will make your mind explode.
Virtua Fighter 5 for PS3 and 360 looks great. It has 40k of polys per fighter and a maximum backfround ploy count of 300k. Per frame VF5 has 380k polys max/sec. Compare that with Rogue 3 which as 20mill polys/sec. It has roughly 60 times more polys than VF5. But VF5 looks infinately graphically better.
Poly performance is 100% not a guage for graphics.
Essay Pro