|
homer said: Charity has no obligation to do so. If welfare was repealed, charity would be overwhelmed with cases and be unable to help many. If he is, his assets should be given to the woman and the man potentially killed depending on the manner which he conducted it and if it is a reoccurance, if she has proof that she indeed was raped. Only problem is gold diggers who want money and don't care about ruining lives, but no process is perfect right? No words. omg. |







