twesterm said:
Again, shitty system. It punishes smaller games and games with little replay value. Just because I play through Mirror's Edge once and spend 8 hours but then spend 20 hours on Mass Effect 3 and Call of Duty doesn't mean they should get more money if I actually liked Mirror's Edge more. And what about bad games that take a long time? And what if Square Enix decided to do that? That would be great for the Final Fantasies and other RPG's but what about something like Tomb Raider where it will probably take 8-ish hours? Should those developers get penalized? Just because a game is long doesn't make it better. And money would never go directly to the devs, that's just a sad truth. |
A) how does netflix do it? i believe they make deals with individual companies to decide on a fair price.
B) if psn+ has taught me nothing else it's that bad games get tossed aside very very quickly when you have access to a lot of content. a long, bad game will never get more playtime from me than a short, good game.
OT - yes, very much yes. I love psn+ very much!