spurgeonryan said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
spurgeonryan said:
Oh alright, now I see why this is kind of bad. I think that maybe they should have switched it around. |
why would this even apply to games that does not have two versions? :S It makes absolutely no sense. I also fail to see how this is kind of bad in any way to a consumer
|
Well if the developers do not want to do it because it takes too long and wastes money then how is it helpful to the consumer? When I said switched around I obviously meant that the games would have to be on both PS3/Vita, but having the Vita version be free to play on the PS3 if you bought it. Wouldn't that be easier to make happen than having to make a different version just to work on the vita? Sorry, maybe I am mixed up. This interested me so I popped in.
|
now you're making ME confused :P
why do you need the vita version be free to play on the ps3 if you have the ps3 version of the game already? I don't get it. If it's a multiplat release like R&C Full Frontal, then you buy the ps3 version, and you get a vita version for free. That's basically all there is to it.
