Lostplanet22 said:
pokoko said:
The idea some people have that "it's the best for me so it must be the best for everyone" annoys me. Value is relative. Using myself as an example, I don't give a rat's fuzzy ass about cross-game chat. If PSN added it tomorrow, I still wouldn't care. I play console games online in brief spurts now and then, not in any dedicated fashion. I mostly use consoles for single-player games, but still, being able to go online on a whim, or try it out multi-player or co-op when I get a new game, without paying for the time I DON'T use it, is awesome to me. When I do play, everything seems to work fine, and any lag I've had seemed to be related to specific game servers rather than to the network. Also, and I mean this with complete and total honesty, the fact that less people have headsets is absolutely glorious to me. Seriously. I spend too much time muting people as it is.
You can tell me that LIVE is best for you, and that's fantastic, but do NOT tell me that it's best for me or for everyone. |
Well that is what you get with a free service =p.
|
I'm not sure what you're saying here. Are you implying that PSN has more immature players than LIVE?
Also, always using FPS games as examples is a bit disingenuous, isn't it? We KNOW that FPS games are far more popular in the US, where the 360 has a massive installed base. What about soccer games, or fighting games, both of which are much more popular on the PS3? What are the numbers for those types of games?
