More evidence that rights-based ethical systems have flawed foundations.

[Mr Khan]

badgenome said:

richardhutnik said:

If the entire basis of human interaction is to be left alone, you have little in the way of human action.  There is no such thing as love in this system either.  And there is nothing in this that manages to help people who want to change.  There is no call to do good or serve others.  It is entirely self-focused.  There are no Good Samaritans either. And that which people consider to be noble is gone.  In the world you have, Superman would go in to business for himself, do celebrity route, become famous, and people would end up dying.  

I didn't say that it's the entire basis of human interaction, just that it's the right you have. Every negative right boils down to just that. So you have the right to speak freely, and that right shall not be infringed upon no matter how unpopular your ideas are. However, you do not and cannot have the right to a forum from which to express your ideas if it means that someone else has to provide that forum for you.

Likewise, just because some freeloader decides that free birth control is a "right" doesn't make it a right.

Where is the room for good Samaritanship in a system in which all charity (and the responsibility to do charitable works for those who believe in such a thing, like Christians) has been made the domain of the government?

Still in the domain of the individual. The state still needs people to execute good works, even if the government is ultimately footing the bill, see: Peace Corps, Americorps.