By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
chapset said:
SamuelRSmith said:
chapset said:

so misleading lol, one is 2008 campaing (at the end of the election) and the other one is 2012 (election not complete)


Why is that important? The raw numbers aren't important, the point is that the rich love Obama just as much as they love Romney.


admit it, you were trying to claim that Obama get more money from the rich and big corp than Mitt Romney

No. I was trying to claim that there is no significant difference between Obama and Romney. This article was trying to claim that there was a big difference.

For example, the article points out that Goldman Sachs is a significant donor to Romney. Goldman Sachs was also the second largest donor to Obama.

The only difference between Obama and Romney is their hairstyles and skin colour.