sethnintendo said:
Micro-evolution is a lot easier to discuss than macro. Micro-evolution is a fact. Sorry I don't have much to add or debate about macro right now. |
Oh, I fully agree that micro-evolution is easy and proven. I don't dispute that. However, you can't really say all evolution is proven and witnessed, when (as BenV put it) only adaptation has been witnessed. That's why I have a problem with that aspect of what Runa is saying - he's trying to state that everything is proven beyond a shadow of doubt, when it really hasn't. Can you inferr a lot? Absolutely. Is it plausible that evolution is true? Yes. Is there some empircal evidence to lend credence to evolution? Yes. Is it absolute fact? No.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.
