mai said:
So conditional sentence (the most probable result of the trial, practically you're getting criminal record and good to go) for "incitement to ethnic or racial hatred", desecration of ceremony and public humiliaton is worse than month and a half in jail for only trespassing the territory and years in jail for some graffiti in synagogue? Riiight. Really, why the excuses? Just admit it, armed only with Google I could bury you under these kind of precedents :D //Though I've figured out it already, that if it'd have happened in synagogue, social consciousness would have stayed dormant. Half of "church desecration" incidents that ends with real sentences in the US took place in synagouges :D Well, unless it doesn't involve killing people like recent story with Sikhs.
|
Yes?
Singing a song at a public ceremony isn't really that big of a deal compaired to breaking into someone elses property and messing up their shit without their permission.
It's like asking what's worse, someone shouting at a public official or throwing a brick through the window of a buisness or breaking into someones house.
How you'd think the first is remotely worse... is silly.
Also... most destruction of religious property is of jewish property. Hence why it's persecuted the most.
Almost nobody messes up Christian Churches and while it happenes more freaquently to mosques, it's not nearly as often as synogogues.
As for the Sikh temple incident, I still have no idea what that was about. Don't know why would have something against them.
