If you had no sex urge, would you be interested in a romantic relationship?

[sperrico87]

AndrewWK said:

sperrico87 said:

AndrewWK said:

sperrico87 said:
Well, romantic relationships don't exist for the purpose of having sexual intercourse. There is a lot more to it than that. Sex is just a small, small part of it. If you're in a relationship only for sex, you'll grow bored very, very quickly and move on to someone else.

So then explain what a romantic relationship is about if sex is just small small part of it?

Is that a serious question? What percentage of time for a couple married 25 years do you think is spent having sex?

And you thinkthis is still a romantic relationship? And it does not matter how many times they have, it matters that they still have.

But that was not my question.

My point is very simple.  If you're honestly saying that sex is all that a romantic relationship is for, then it suggests you're very confused.  If it were true, then the only activity that couples engaged in would be sex.  Obviously, that is far from the only activity romantic couples engage in.  I shouldn't have to explain to you what people do when they're not engaged in intercourse.