Andrespetmonkey on 11 August 2012
| fighter said: 1 Doom article 2 Very factual analysis What's the point of their regrouping again ? |
doom and gloom
And the 2nd article wasn't just a factual analysis, the writer's opinion was expressed and sometimes just plain wrong. For example, he writes "Now, it’s succeeding to some degree, though it’s still far behind both of its competitors."
Outselling it's 2 competitors each week = "now succeeding to some degree"?
2m behind 360 after one year less on the market = "far behind"?
And all 3 of these articles would attract largely the same reactions, discussions and arguments so why make 3 different threads for it?
