"After the PlayStation 3’s price started to fall and Sony offered up some redesigns, the console staged a comeback. Now, it’s succeeding to some degree, though it’s still far behind both of its competitors."
Far behind is it? (Yoda voice) The 360's at 67.6m and the PS3 is at 65.8m, and the PS3 started selling a year after the 360. So why are they saying "it's still far behind"? Answer: typical B.S.
"Sony learned nothing from the PSP’s failure as a portable gaming device"
PSP is at 75m, and still selling well, is that a failure? Answer: no. So why are they saying it's a failure? Answer: typical B.S.
"During the August 2nd investor conference call, when asked directly whether the results had anything to with the Vita performing below expectations, the response from Sony's senior staff was that "currency movements" alone were to blame. "
This.
So why cut and paste this B.S? Why am I even responding to this B.S? That's the question!
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
