Soundwave said:
Both companies wouldn't have the same ideas and approaches in mind with their first party. And if they were to handle their own original FP studios and not make decisions for the other, then it kindoff nulifies part of the partnership in the first place. Who says either Nintendo or Sony want an XBL service? Both just want a big audience, and no doubt I see things with the Miis + Miiverse and not to mention Nintendo's incredible back catalog of classic software that would be extremely appealling to Sony. You're missing my point here, which is that both companies don't have obvious weaknesses where the other has strengths, like you said. They both have a weakness in the same area. Microsoft and Sony is more fitting here because Microsoft has a strength where Sony has a weakness, Microsoft can help Sony here, just as Sony can help Microsoft when it comes to first party infrastructure. Yeah XBL is great ... but I mean lets just think of the Virtual Console potentially -- NES, SNES, N64, Playstation, PS2, GameCube, Wii, PS3. Good luck competing with that, Microsoft. Could happen with Nintendo, but not with Sony. Sony have clearly gone down the route of re-releasing games from last-gen platforms with improvements to graphics or performance on current-gen platforms. Nintendo aren't doing this. What about this? " Sony sells consoles at a loss at launch, Nintendo doesn't and I don't think they'd be willing to with Sony's partnership, it's not any form of security considering Sony's financial state, in fact it'd probably raise the risk." |








