By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
spaceguy on 03 August 2012
Edit Thread
kaneada said:
badgenome said:
Viper1 said:

Actually the point was simple irony.

All those people supporting CFA for their anti-gay stance utilizing technology and services from pro-gay companies in the process.

But they're not attempting to boycott those companies, so it's not really ironic. They're just supporting one company that's getting a lot of shit for having a wrong opinion, including a lot of local asshole politicians threatening to take flagrantly unconstitutional actions against it.

As unconstitutional as those actions are, its is also unconstitutional to retro fit a definition of marriage as defined by a relgion and furthermore deny people the right to marry based on their sexual preferences. At this point its really an eye for an eye. All this crying about the flagrant abuse of the 1st amendment from a party that has continually pushed their agenda's by abusing the 1st amendment is hyprocritcal at best.


Fuggin nailed it!!!^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Seperation of church and state big on the constitution, yet they don't won't to admit the whole idea they spewed in the first place is against what the constitution standed for in the first place. To stop religion from creating another dark age of oppression.

This is how hatred works you pick what you don't like and just ignore the rest. LIKE!!!!

 "DIVORCE is as against the bible as homosexuality... MASTURBATION is as against the bible as homosexuality... ANAL and ORAL sex are as against the bible as homosexuality.... SEX WITH YOUR WIFE 7 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER HER PERIOD is as against the bible as homosexuality. if you are CLINGING to one bible verse, you might want to brush up on the others. - think a little hate won't hurt anyone? think again."