By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
badgenome said:
Viper1 said:

Actually the point was simple irony.

All those people supporting CFA for their anti-gay stance utilizing technology and services from pro-gay companies in the process.

But they're not attempting to boycott those companies, so it's not really ironic. They're just supporting one company that's getting a lot of shit for having a wrong opinion, including a lot of local asshole politicians threatening to take flagrantly unconstitutional actions against it.

As unconstitutional as those actions are, its is also unconstitutional to retro fit a definition of marriage as defined by a relgion and furthermore deny people the right to marry based on their sexual preferences. At this point its really an eye for an eye. All this crying about the flagrant abuse of the 1st amendment from a party that has continually pushed their agenda's by abusing the 1st amendment is hyprocritcal at best.



-- Nothing is nicer than seeing your PS3 on an HDTV through an HDMI cable for the first time.