By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
richardhutnik said:
Kasz216 said:
richardhutnik said:

And I am getting this outrage pouring out on Facebook.  First, the Oreo issue, then Chik-Fil-A.  I had one person express their outrage by posting this on their wall:

 

There are times I wish the Facebook wall were just used for funny pictures and videos.  I am like, some things about you I don't want to know about.

And that sad part is... somebody could post the exact same graphic, but swap the words... and it would be just as valid.

The person posting it actually had the opposite view as expressed there, and were showing it to score points for their view, by showing how the views of the other side contradicted.

Yeah... if you ask me, Protests are valid, as are counter protests.

The only difference really is that Chick-Fil-A isn't a publicly traded company.

Whether that makes it better or worse who can say.

One could argue it makes Chick Fil-a worse and more deserving of a boycott since Owner views and company views are unseperable.

Others may argue that the Oreo case would be worse because it's a publicly traded company and it's hurting base demographics.

Less wise in Oreo's case, although Oreo was also more subtle about it, instead of calling an entire generation of consumers "arrogant"



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.