Kasz216 said:
Yeah... if you ask me, Protests are valid, as are counter protests. The only difference really is that Chick-Fil-A isn't a publicly traded company. Whether that makes it better or worse who can say. One could argue it makes Chick Fil-a worse and more deserving of a boycott since Owner views and company views are unseperable. Others may argue that the Oreo case would be worse because it's a publicly traded company and it's hurting base demographics. |
Less wise in Oreo's case, although Oreo was also more subtle about it, instead of calling an entire generation of consumers "arrogant"
Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.