| theprof00 said: No kasz it isnt a nonrelated factor it is a factor that happy refuses to acknowledge, and now you as well. I said the government helps business by employing people and he called it a thief. That fact of the matter is that they can both be considered employees who provide for the business, get paid by the business, and spend at the business. It is the unwillingness to see that point that hinders our discussion. Both republicans and democrats say that the jan 1 cuts would severly hurt the economy. Now tell me again that it is my failire in comprehension again, and not the truth of the matter that government is instrumental in job creation. |
Your post here seems pretty incoherent. I can't understand what your actually saying... but i'm going to take a stab at it. (Not an insult. Really can't understand the first part.)
Are you suggesting that people on welfare should be considered as working for the buisness?
That's just silly.
And yeah, Jan 1 cuts would severly hurt the economy.... and those cuts will hurt whenever they have to be made... because they will have to be made.
That's the advantage of deficit spending.
You get extra economic boosts in the short term. Of course, that spending has to eventually stop or there is a crash.
Or you have to raise taxes... and there is a crash.
Either way, in the end there is a bigger crash then there was benefit.
The point of countercycle economics... was that you make things easier when things are worse.... then take a big hit when you get back to prospeirty.
Or at least that USED to be the point of it before it got politisized... and in general the main issue is... it pretty much never works.
