|
Kasz216 said: Yeah, the UN ordered them to do nothing. The US though did have the political will to send troops to actually do something in Rwanda. Clinton just didn't have the will. |
Forget Rwanda. It's was just an example how nobody cares (including UN) when there's no political advanatges. My point is pretty clear, no need to overcomplicate it. There're reasons behind this and numerous other wars besides what official propaganda might and did say ("for everything that's good, against everything that's evil"), political entities are fight for political purposes. I understand that people are influenced by propaganda regardless of how rational they might be (d-oh! everyone wants to be moral, even when there's absolutely no way to regard oneself as moral), but that's not a reason for Joel-like stupidness (yeah, I love the guy and his undisturbed mind :D ).
That's enough of truisms for today from me, so you may go on on pointless discussion wheter there were ethnic cleansings or not. Thread is hopelessly derailed (should be noted - without my help).
Note to Player: you're doing it wrong (I mean the discussion). Attack, do not defend. Remind him about Indians genocide, concentration camps for Japanese, Vietnam, Japanese bombings or smth along those lines especially from modern history, there's always a material that could be brought to discsussion and blown out from proportion :D As I've said everyone wants to be moral, or by Kaz's words "People who are part of countries who commit ethnic cleansing never want to own up to the fact that they let it happen". P.S.: You may talk to me in Serbian.
