Kantor said:
Player1x3 said:
Kantor said:
mrstickball said: I haven't read every comment, but how many people are discussing the fact that Rahm Emmanuel and Boston's mayor are using the power of their office to bar a business from their cities, whereas the statement from Truett Cathy has virtually no bearing on the business, nor people that are gay? Talk about a double standard. If Chicago or Boston banned a business because it was run by blacks, wouldn't that be pretty bigoted? Only one entity in this discussion effects anyone else - and it isn't Chick-fil-A or Truett Cathy. |
That is silly. Being black is not a choice. Being a homophobic bigot is a choice.
|
Being an intolerant local tyrant anti-first amendment liberal hypocrite is also a choice
|
Cathy isn't being prosecuted for his remarks, so the first amendment is not being violated.
|
Actually, his first amendment IS being violated if politicians in multiple cities are exerting political power against he and his company.
I have no qualms if individuals or even companies (such as the Muppets) want to fire back at Chick-fil-A for what happened. However, when politicians step in, I start thinking of "Hate speech" laws and using such things to supress various kinds of speech.