IIIIITHE1IIIII on 26 July 2012
NintendoPie said:
It looked like you were defending D against hitting someone when he didn't. If he didn't hit anyone in this case wouldn't he be the "best"? |
Whether he's best or not depends completely on the situation (which would need far more details). Let's make person B an old lady, while C is an average pedestrian willing to defend her. Wouldn't direct actions be better than calling the cops (since she would get more injured by waiting for the cops)? But then there is also the bravery factor. Is a brave person (who dare to confront person A) 'better' than someone who sees calling the cops as the only option? Side-note: As you may know, I don't believe in free will, so personally I wouldn't call anyone 'better'.
