Mr Khan said:
That's why i think the Boston guy hasn't said anything definitive, while the alderman from Chicago is more likely to say such things (similar to how the president might say "so and so is bad" while a congressman will propose some sort of loony legislation about said so and so). The alderman's just pandering, and likely wouldn't act on the matter. |
Actually it looks like he more or less did this... and is also using "Trafic issues" as a secondary excuse to hide behind legally.








