By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Ok, I will say I can see a case of where a conglomerate, that was assembled and running poorly, would benefit from being broken up, and the different parts sold off.  If a company has negative synergy with its assets, it makes sense to break them up.

However, what I wanted to ask about this this form of leverage buy-out: Investors borrow a bunch of money and buy up a company, and pledge the assets of the company they purchased as collatoral for the loan.  They get their cut of doing this.  At this point, the company is now saddled with a lot of debt, and has new owners.  So, my question is, what makes this scenario good?