sperrico87 said:
I completely disagree with the premise of your question. I don't think that just because there is a shooting, that there should be an automatic debate on gun laws and Second Amendment rights. I see no correlation whatsoever. Criminals are people who by definition do not abide by laws, so how can you say that law-abiding citizens should have their right to bear arms diminished or taken away because an insane person went on a rampage? Better yet, why would you willingly take away the right of people to defend themselves against violent crimes in progress? If more people in that theatre had a concealed pistol, they could have taken the shooter down and saved lives. I just see no sense in your post at all. |
We've been over this endlessly. A second shooter would have just likely shot more innocents in the confusion, or hesitated for fear of doing so, like the individual who was conceal-carrying during the Gabrielle Giffords shooting. Concealed-carry people are not automatically heroes.

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.







