steven787 on 01 February 2008
They are trying to say that the PS3 finally has some games coming out, and sales are picking up. Nothing more, nothing less.
Forbes isn't "taking sides" when they feature this oil company or that CEO. With cover stories about Apple under siege or Exxon-Mobil market moves.
EGM isn't taking sides when it says "The revenge of the PS3" as a one year anniversary to this cover.
Nor is it MS biased when it put Halo 3 on the cover 4+ times in the last 18 months.
Nor when it ran a cover story on Zelda or the surprise success of the wii
This may be a little biased :)
http://img.engadget.com/common/images/3060000000046693.JPG%3F0.3784043935620143" width="191" height="246">
I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.
