By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 on 17 July 2012
Edit Thread
Icy-Zone said:
Kasz216 said:

Oh... and I think most Iranians would generally take offense at that video "Telling their side of the story".

I quite think you'd be arrested as soon as you hit the section on Religion...

So i'm not quite sure why you thought that video was going to give me the Iranian perspective.


Because the film was focused purely on religion and didn't cover topics such as the Israel's unlawful occupation of land, and the threat of a very unstable and aggressive country called America. I'm sure the majority (keyword since you love democracy so much) of Iranians would agree with, and already understand much of what was shown.

Basically put, if Iran isn't allowed nukes, the US shouldn't be allowed either.

If you want to follow a scoreboard for nuke usage (this could possibly be a way to measure stability, even though stability is hardly quantifiable) we can say that the US has two points:  for the bombings of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, whilst the Iranians have a score of 0. So to say that Iran is the type that would drop nukes should they acquire some, is purely speculation as there has been no past behaviour, on their part, that would suggeset they would.

Thank you and have a great day.

See, the differnce here is... I'm actually reading what your saying and pointing out where your logical fallicies lie.

While you don't actually seem to be reading or paying attention to anything.

As always, where your arguement fails is context.  If you'd use that... and well actually read my posts.  This entire reply wouldn't of happened... because it's all been adressed already.

If your just going to argue already disproven statements and not offer any knew information, it probably is best that you plan to drop the conversation.