Iran will be a Nuclear State by 2014.

[deskpro2k3]

Kasz216 said:

Or if you mean the US nuke thing...

The logical fallacy in that was... the US had Nuclear weapons first.

No one else was in the same position in as the US to use them... because after they got them... the US already had them.

All it takes to make that argument look stupid is context.

It looks even stupider if you know much about WW2 and studied Japan's actual reaction. Which historical experts pretty much agree was either "Nuclear weapons caused them to surrender only after the second bomb" or "Nuclear weapons didn't make them surrender, it was actually the threat of Russian invasion."


So yeah... not very well thought out.

 

I'll do you this favor just this once. The point of my statement was that while the US bomb dozens of other countries contradicts on how they allow Pakistan, and India to keep nukes while terrorist is known to live there, and at the sametime preach freedom and liberty for all. Here is another example, they thought saddam hussein have WMD, and the media kept preaching it on the air none stop, but we didn't find any. So far no one have any evidence of Iran weaponizing their nukes and yet the media is spreading fear, and we're already attacking Iran via cyber attacks.. I'm just not going to assume anything without evidence for it. where is the logic in that.