thranx on 11 July 2012
| spaceguy said: Micheal is a idiot, I'm sorry but the $99 dollar deal has went over bad. Also if this was to happen and they force me to choose my tv provider just to game, I will not be buying MS anymore. Sorry but I like to game just to game. I like my smart tv and thats just it. People already have smart TV's and lots of them have sold. WHy do I need a machine if my tv already does it. gaming and tv should be kept seperate and people will feel the same. Lets say they want to do this. What if I want to go to a friends house? or the damn tv goes out. WiiU is starting to look really good if this is the case. You want to have tv at your house, call directv or who ever you want because this is bad for gaming. I game to game, not to do all this sh-t my tv already does. I have last Fm on my tv and all that. My tv has made my Xbox multi media not necessary but does that stop me from gaming and using it for what it is for? no It doesn't. However as much as micheal has been wrong, I highly doubt MS will be that stupid to basically give a ultamatum. God I would love to be pachter, Just seat around and make up bull sh-t all day. I'm starting to think pachter get told stuff to see people's reaction. So if there is a good reaction then they will go wtih it. |
so they expand the deal to more retailers cause it doesn't do well? How about some evidence for that.
I think this is great. I hate my set top boxes and would love to use my xbox instead of one.
Currently with my cable plane i pay an extra 15 dollars a month for my HD DVR, I am sure there is a way for ms to partner with current cable companies to offer the xbox as a set top box and pay 15 a month for that instead of the shitty box i have. So there would be no need for ms to become a cable company, rather they could make the set top box and get a cut of the fee. Not sure what other companies charge per box, and for hd and dvr boxes but there is space in there for some profit for ms.
