Dodece on 05 July 2012
@Soleron
I still think the onus should be on them providing the data. Rather then them interpreting the data. If you are the one running the experiment you shouldn't openly be a proponent of one theory or another. It is like a referee taking up sides in a game. There are multiple models out there, and saying this is that particle in this popular model opens them up to being wrong. They don't have to put themselves in a position where they could end up being wrong. The truth is anyone hearing this data could sum it up to the public without them putting themselves on the line.
