Sal.Paradise on 02 July 2012
| crissindahouse said: ah ok so it isn't so expensive because it did not really make money until now and onlive is making money right now so if you only need the tech and let's say both techs would be the same quality, onlive would be pretty useless because the tech alone you want to use is only woth much less. i think microsoft should really try to start an own service then. no clue about next patent wars but paying much more for something which wouldn't be more useful for them sounds pretty much like money wasting. |
I wouldn't be surprised if MS just made their own solution ground up, they're capable of doing it. (Although I gotta say, the only MS cloud-esque service I've ever used, SkyDrive, is kinda shit.)
